Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
The regular procedure of a communication to the WGAD will trigger the adoption of an opinion of the WGAD as to the arbitrariness of the detention.
The WGAD issues approximately 70-90 opinions per year and all of these are adopted during its sessions. In each opinion, which is a public document (once adopted), the WGAD examines whether the situation presented is one of arbitrary detention and if so, the WGAD qualifies the situation under one or more of the five categories. It then recommends that the State take appropriate actions (usually the release of the individual) and may also ask for reparations (e.g. compensation) as well as guarantees of non-repetition.
Each opinion entails a follow-up section where the Government and the source are asked to respond within six months on the steps taken regarding the implementation of its recommendations. The WGAD may also invite other parties, such as civil society organizations, to provide further information on the implementation of the suggested measures.
Opinions adopted by the WGAD
To access all the opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, please visit the WGAD database, where you can search by date, category, region and symbol. To access the opinions in all six UN languages, please use the Official Document System of the United Nations
You can also visit the links below for the opinions adopted by the Working Group at each session.
- Opinions adopted in 2016
- Opinions adopted in 2015
- Opinions adopted in 2014
- Opinions adopted in 2013
- Opinions adopted in 2012 and in November 2011
- Opinions adopted between November 2010 and August 2011
- Opinions adopted in 2010
- Full text of opinions (2008/17 -2008/46, 2009/1 - 2009/17)
- Full text of opinions (2007/14 - 2007/40, 2008/1-2008/16)
- Full text of opinions (2006/32 - 2006/47, 2007/1 - 2007/13)
- Full text of opinions (2005/38 - 2005/48, 2006/1 - 2006/31)
- Full text of opinions (2004/20 - 2004/25, 2005/1 - 2005/37)
- Full text of opinions (2003/19 - 2003/26, 2004/1 - 2004/19)
- Full text of opinions (2002/15 - 2002/21, 2003/1 - 2003/18)
- Full text of opinions (2001/19 - 2001/31, 2002/1 - 2002/14)
- Full text of opinions (2000/29 - 2000/39, 2001/1 - 2001/18)
- Full text of opinions (1999/24 - 1999/36, 2000/1 - 2000/28)
- Full text of opinions (1998/22 - 1998/31, 1999/1 - 1999/23)
- Full text of opinions (1998/1 - 1998/21)
- Full text of decisions and opinions (1996/37 – 1996/49, 1997/1 - 1997/15)
- Full text of decisions and opinions (1995/35 – 1995/49, 1996/1 - 1996/36 and revised opinions 1996/1 – 1996/3)
- Full text of decisions and opinions (1994/35 – 1994/48, 1995/1 - 1995/34)
- Full text of decisions and opinions (1993/43 – 1993/67, 1994/1 - 1994/9)
- Full text of decisions and opinions (1994/10 - 1994/34)
- Full text of decisions (1992/43, 1992/45 - 1992/47, 1992/52, 1992/53, 1993/1 - 1993/42, 1993/45, 1993/48, 1993/49, 1993/50)
- Full text of decisions (1992/1 - 1992/42, 1992/44, 1992/48 - 1992/51, 1992/54)